This is the special issue that corresponds to Millennium’s 2014 Conference Quo vadis IR: Method, Methodology and Innovation. You can order a copy of the issue or view it online at mil.sagepub.com. Alternatively you can view the issue online.
See below for a list of the issue’s content:
Introduction
- Cora Lacatus, Daniel Schade, and Yuan (Joanne) Yao: Quo vadis IR: Method, Methodology and Innovation
Articles
- Milja Kurki: Stretching Situated Knowledge: From Standpoint Epistemology to Cosmology and Back Again
- Cecilie Basberg Neumann and Iver B. Neumann: Uses of the Self: Two Ways of Thinking about Scholarly Situatedness and Method
- Sarah Naumes: Is all ‘I’ IR?
- David Chandler: A World without Causation: Big Data and the Coming of Age of Posthumanism
- J. Samuel Barkin and Laura Sjoberg: Calculating Critique: Thinking Outside the Methods Matching Game
- Roland Bleiker: Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics
- William A. Callahan: The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method
- Elena Barabantseva and Andy Lawrence: Encountering Vulnerabilities through ‘Filmmaking for Fieldwork’
- Can E. Mutlu: How (Not) to Disappear Completely: Pedagogical Potential of Research Methods in International Relations
Keynotes
- Patrick Thaddeus Jackson: Must International Studies Be a Science?
- Andrew Bennett: Found in Translation: Combining Discourse Analysis with Computer Assisted Content Analysis
Responses
- Iver B. Neumann: International Studies Must Be a Social Science: A Friendly Quarrel with PTJ
- Mark B. Salter: #sorrynotsorry: A Well-meaning Response to PTJ
- Meera Sabaratnam: Staging a Battle, Losing the Wars? International Studies, ‘Science’ and the Neoliberalisation of the University
- Nicola Chelotti: On Movies, Matrices and Scope: Some Remarks on PTJ’s Keynote
- Can E. Mutlu: Of Algorithms, Data and Ethics: A Response to Andrew Bennett
- J. Samuel Barkin: Translatable? On Mixed Methods and Methodology
- Laura Sjoberg: What’s Lost in Translation? Neopositivism and Critical Research Interests
